Adding Particulate or Non-Particulate Steroids to the Local Anesthetics When Performing Parasagittal Interlaminar Epidural Injections.
نویسندگان
چکیده
We read with great interest a recent study by Ghai et al (1) wherein they followed 56 out of 69 randomized patients for 12 months following parasagittal interlaminar (PIL) injection with local anesthetics (LA) alone or LA with steroid (LS). We agree with author’s choice of technique to achieve adequate and consistent ventral epidural spread of injectate. Parasagittal interlaminar epidural steroid injections are underrepresented in the literature and frequently are not differentiated from midline interlaminar epidural steroid injections, by authors performing analyses of efficacy. We were successful at presenting the advantages of PIL-ESI with regards to ventral spread of contrast (2), clear superiority to midline interlaminar (MIL-ESI) (3), and non-inferiority to transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TF-ESI)(2). In 2008, we used an independent blinded radiologist not affiliated with primary study institution to confirm scoring of ventral epidural spread as observed on the lateral projection fluoroscopic images (2). We also recognize the author’s input in favor of utilizing a parasagittal technique in interventional low back pain management (4,5) in light of great controversy associated with epidural steroid injections and utilization of corticosteroids for interventional management of chronic lumbar radiculopathy. However, Ghai et al (1), when comparing results of their study with previous studies done by Manchikanti (6-11) (Table 1), failed to properly address a major difference between these studies. Instead of commenting on differences in study patients’ clinical and ethnic characteristics, they should have focused their discussion on differences between insoluble (particulate) methylprednisolone and soluble (non-particulate) betamethasone steroids. Manchikanti et al showed that lidocaine alone provides clinically significant pain relief and functional improvement regardless of whether the drug is administered as a caudal, interlaminar, or transforaminal lumbar injection (12,13). After reviewing all relevant studies by Manchikanti et al (Table 1), it is evident that addition of steroids might be superior in some patients with disc herniation as it was shown in this present study and in the most recent review (1). However, in all studies they strictly utilized betamethasone.
منابع مشابه
Description of Optimal Angle of Needle Insertion For L5 Transforaminal Epidural Injection Leads to Complications.
Ra and Min (1) painstakingly have described the optimal angle of needle insertion for fluoroscopically guided transforaminal epidural injection of L5. Unfortunately, this potentially increases further complications related to lumbar transforaminal epidural injections with the safe triangle approach (2).Clearly, the literature undeniably shows that the safe triangle approach may not be safe and ...
متن کاملEvaluation of fluoroscopic caudal epidural steroid injections.
To the Editor: Two articles, one by Botwin (1) and the other by Manchikanti (2), in the January 2004 edition of Pain Physician helped confirm that patterns of epidural injections exist, depending on the site of injection among other variables. Botwin concluded that ventral spread, considered the target site, only occurs 36% of the time with interlaminar injections, and bilateral spread only 16%...
متن کاملPreliminary results of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of fluoroscopic lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic lumbar discogenic pain without disc herniation or radiculitis.
BACKGROUND Low back pain without disc herniation is the most common problem among chronic pain disorders. Epidural injections are commonly used interventions in managing chronic low back pain without disc herniation. However, little evidence exists regarding the effectiveness, indications, and medical necessity of lumbar epidural injections in managing axial low back pain without disc herniatio...
متن کاملFluoroscopic lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic lumbar axial or discogenic pain
Among the multiple causes of chronic low back pain, axial and discogenic pain are common. Various modalities of treatments are utilized in managing discogenic and axial low back pain including epidural injections. However, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the effectiveness, indications, and medical necessity of any treatment modality utilized for managing axial or discogenic pain, inclu...
متن کاملEvaluation of the effectiveness of lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic pain of lumbar disc herniation or radiculitis: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.
BACKGROUND The pathophysiology of lumbar radicular pain is the subject of ongoing research, with a reported prevalence of sciatica or radiculitis ranging from 1.2% to 43%. Among the numerous non-surgical interventions available, epidural injections are the most commonly performed interventions in the United States in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain. STUDY DESIGN A randomize...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Pain physician
دوره 18 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015